Current:Home > StocksSupreme Court rejects R. Kelly's child sexual abuse appeal, 20-year sentence stands -AssetScope
Supreme Court rejects R. Kelly's child sexual abuse appeal, 20-year sentence stands
View
Date:2025-04-14 16:01:54
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear imprisoned former R&B superstar R. Kelly's appeal of his 2022 federal conviction on charges involving child pornography and luring underage girls to have sex with him, one of two cases in which he was found guilty of sex crimes.
The justices turned away Kelly's challenge to a lower court's decision upholding his conviction by a federal jury in Chicago.
Kelly, 57, claimed in his Supreme Court filing that prosecutors filed the charges against him in the case after the statute of limitations had expired.
During that trial, several women testified that Kelly sexually abused them when they were minors. The jury also was shown video of Kelly molesting his goddaughter, who testified that the abuse began in the 1990s when she was a teenager.
Kelly, born Robert Sylvester Kelly, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in the case. He was found guilty of three child pornography counts and three counts of enticing minors for sex, but acquitted of seven other charges that included obstruction of justice and conspiracy to receive child pornography.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Kelly in 2021 was convicted in another trial by a jury in New York City's borough of Brooklyn on all nine charges he faced, including racketeering and eight counts of violating the Mann Act, which forbids transporting people across state lines for prostitution. He was given a 30-year prison sentence in that case, set to largely overlap with his sentence in the Chicago case.
Kelly is incarcerated at a Butner, North Carolina federal prison and is eligible for release in 2045, according to federal Bureau of Prisons records.
Where is Diddy being held?New York jail that housed R. Kelly, Ghislaine Maxwell
Kelly filed his Supreme Court appeal after the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April rejected his challenge.
veryGood! (436)
Related
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- See the Best Dressed Stars Ever at the Kentucky Derby
- When does life begin? As state laws define it, science, politics and religion clash
- How to behave on an airplane during the beast of summer travel
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Vanderpump Rules Alum Kristen Doute Weighs In on Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss’ Affair
- The Summer I Turned Pretty Season 2 Finally Has a Release Date
- Score a $58 Deal on $109 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Products and Treat Your Skin to Luxurious Hydration
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Volkswagen relaunches microbus as electric ID. Buzz
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Jennifer Lopez Shares How Her Twins Emme and Max Are Embracing Being Teenagers
- 2016’s Record Heat Not Possible Without Global Warming, Study Says
- The new COVID booster could be the last you'll need for a year, federal officials say
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- You Won't Be Sleepless Over This Rare Photo of Meg Ryan
- Tennessee woman accused of trying to hire hitman to kill wife of man she met on Match.com
- SEC sues crypto giant Binance, alleging it operated an illegal exchange
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Stacey Abrams is behind in the polls and looking to abortion rights to help her win
Trump Takes Ax to Science and Other Advisory Committees, Sparking Backlash
Kate Middleton Rules With Her Fabulous White Dress Ahead of King Charles III's Coronation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Below Deck Alum Kate Chastain Gives Birth, Welcomes First Baby
Whatever happened to the Indonesian rehab that didn't insist on abstinence?
Whatever happened to the new no-patent COVID vaccine touted as a global game changer?